If it were to come in at $9.99 or under, probably do a couple; if we were to get it at $5.99 or under (though can’t imagine it coming in under that) could maybe even do 3-4. I’ll go $20 for one world, at least for as long as I can swing it, but not more than $25, though even then might still do it just for a month or two perhaps to support them and play with it a bit.
I think if it was $5-6 a month people may buy 2-4 and after first month not repay it. I said $15. To me that’s kind of a higher commitment and makes you think if truly want one
Alternatively, I’m planning to rent worlds over a longer time period than monthly basis. I want to commit to a set of worlds through January 2022, and then consider funding through the next year at that time. To me, the reassurance of both longevity and management are the greatest draw.
I’m going to rent a planet at least but if super cheap why not rent a few and just horde resources for a month if connected to known world? And let it die after that
Not at all. You should only pay what you actually think it’s worth (to you). If they can’t offer what you want at a price you find reasonable, that’s not being a cheapskate. It’s being responsible with your money.
From my perspective, (without more information) people willing to pay $15+ a month for their rental have way more money than sense, but if they can afford to and think that it’s genuinely worth it, more power to them.
I dont rent , but i do know that it all comes to how much does it cost to them to have lets say 50 planets up.
If they price it too low… theres some serious issues cause renting price doesnt cut the bill of running the planets…
I would rather have it more of a high end thing than low end. If anybody can go and buy it with 5€ a month theres not much player left for the current perma worlds i think… also this could cut down people who would purchase GC… if the price is the same or even close i would say i would rent a planet than getting Gc cause theres not much really in Gc if you look at it.