We have a book for overflow in front of our guild hall off the Grovidias Te PS hub!
2 Likes
yes and if that fills up we can make more overflows. but people can join multiple factions too. This is not an ideal solution 
1 Like
a cap is good but the cap right now is way way too low if we are hitting the cap even with are small playerbase then that is a problemā¦normally the player cap i have seen in other MMOās for guilds is 1000
4 Likes
The name of the release was āEmpiresā. A cap of a 100 isnāt even a town 
4 Likes
Well technically the cap is 800. Since each faction is not a guild in itself and is controlled by the leader of the main guild.
Personally, I think the design of the guilds/factions is not fair to settlements. Each faction should be able to have their own directors separate than the main guild.
1 Like
not if you plan to use the features that the factions provideā¦ You can only manage 100 people at a time.
2 Likes
Unclear what is meant hereā¦ I think a cap this low stands to alienate players and force big guilds to exclude people in a forced move toward āmonopolizationā for the sake of having alts managed and accounted by membership of the parent guild. I may be misunderstanding the context for use of āmonopoly.ā I am open to hear more on the case of how itās a bad thing for big guilds to get bigger, if thatās what was meant.
The Curse of the Alt Parade.
I wish 1 char could just do it all.
4 Likes
Devs should get rid of alts and allow us to have as many skill sets as we want, IMO.
6 Likes
I do like alts as an option. I do not like alts as the only option. Boundless forces you to have alts if you want to have the full package.
Also, I dislike starving to death because I changed skill tabs.
3 Likes
Only if the skill set progression starts at lvl 1, just like alts and all my alts get added as skill sets. The way skill sets work right now is garā¦ermā¦not good. They require way too much XP to advance.
1 Like
I fail to see the point of having such a low cap in the first place. As the game grows in player population, content, and overall popularity, the cap is going to need to go up anyways. Setting it low now is kind of a backwards decision.
What I would like is to see the cap raised to 2000. Whether most guilds reach that is completely irrelevant. It at least provides room for the smallest guilds and largest guilds in the game currently with space to expand their ranks.
Guilds shouldnāt be forced to make actual full fledged sister guilds that are branches of the main just to have another allotment of membership slots. That also presents guild management frustrations for absolutely no reason.
I really want to know the reason to set the limit number for guild members. -_-
Guild system in any games are related to competition.
You want more people join, you need to spend more time to communicate with others or promote your guild.
People saying that some guilds will monopoliz is really weird here.
I mean with or without the guild system we all have guild discords setup, and that can be no limit for members. We have 100% free to control the member number in our discords.
To be honest if the cap is 100 or 200 including alts, i prefer they donāt release this system.
It just make people feel our guild is full and we stop recruiting new members.
It only cause huge confusion and misunderstanding for people who may wants to join our guild.
Also devs already allow people to have 10 guild in list to switch at anytime,
Players can always choose the best one they love.
If 600 players choose in 1 guild, mean that guild must done something amazing in some area.
If the reason is because the coding side issue or system data issue itās somehow accepted, but i still wish devs can fix it as soon as possible.
But if this member limited design base on ābalanceā purpose, it will be the most weird guild system i know in my life.
1 Like
Itās an irrational fear based off absolutely nothing valid. I donāt get it either man.
2 Likes
I think it is based on buffs and the cost of the buffs. At 160,000 coin per week or 8.32 millions per year, I think there is a fear that a lot of guilds will not have 24.6 million coin per year to spend on the best buffs. So the ones that do will be the guilds that have all the members? Or at least that will be the players primary guild so they get the buffs.
Not sure but all I can think of.
Edit I guess it is possible the developers want guilds to compete for members and the way to do that is limit the membership? But 100 members may still be to low.
Exactly how I feel.
Kinda low key hoping the devs are noticing the problem with guilds filling up quickly bc of alts and decide to try and redesign the skill cost/skill sets/progression so ppl donāt feel the need for so many alts unless they want a diff look or name. Or privacy. shrug
1 Like
Well, People all have equal opportunity to become a strong guild.
Guild like Ultima and Ps they donāt get really strong advantage than most of us.
They have something great portal network setup is correct, but you still canāt say its the best setup in future.
A lot of nice guild grow after ps & ultima as well.
If they need money to get the guild buff ( which i donāt even think those buff will affect most end game players lol)
they can always start a good business to make money to active their buffs.
It takes time for sure, but for most famous guild people paid their time too, the difference is they put their effort earlier, and they joined the game earlier.
1 Like
Organized guilds will be able to manage all of that. It isnāt like the buffs are game breakingly necessary.
Even if the idea is to have guilds compete for membersā¦ I think thatās going to lead down a path where guilds kick members out cause they arenāt providing enough coin cause they are a worse shopkeeper than someone else that is replacing them. I donāt know if it would promote healthy competition. I just see elitist scum beggary happening.
I could be very wrong though and want to be considering all the toxicity that exists in the game anyways.
EDIT: Also, 24.6 million coin a year isnāt a lot.
@wade44423 Personally I am not sure the buffs are worth the coin, but others might feel they are vital to gameplay and create and āAdvantageā to wealthier guilds. I do wonder about such a massive coin sink, but that is off topic.
I would agree that the buffs are not game breaking. I know they have talked about adding more buffs in the future, but I would think they would be pretty careful about what they introduce. And they could always take it back when it runs out so no one has to loose anything.
I personally would agree that having guilds start to kick out members to stay under a member limit is probably going to be really bad for the game.
I would disagree that 24.6 million coin is not a lot, but that is based on my experience.
It isnāt a lot. If you have a 100 member guild that each person can consistently each month afford 100k coin. Adds up fast. You can pay for that 24.6 million multiples times a year. But thatās talking about an ideal situation and those arenāt very realistic. I donāt know if itās manageable or not. I care more about the plot and settlement protection stuff. I am with you though on the buffs not worth the coin.
I think one of the developers of Crowfall best put it: āthe juice isnāt worth the squeezeā
I donāt see it being a problem for a guild that wants to finance those buffs. It might actually incentivize players who have inactive shops to make them active instead of wasting peopleās time visiting them just so they can find a place to buy tools or sell their resources at.