Is this true? If so, it would be a true game changer and really breathe new life into the game!
3 Likes
dont think anyone will pay 80 euro for switch2 game
I’d never spend euros … but Id buy it for Switch…
4 Likes
the 2nd cons is you need to buy and pay monthly nintendo playonline sub to play online game
No that is incorrect, $50 yearly is what Nintendo charges for NSO(last I saw), which is quite a bit worth it when you consider the effort they put into making their classics libraries fun and fresh, tomorrow we are getting Chibi Robo fir the GameCube and I am too excited for this.
1 Like
If it does, I’m buying it again. We want it!
1 Like
i have switch1, i need to pay 16eur monthly to play games with online/multiplayer mode, either if i want to use online content or not
Weird. Must be an EU thing then.
It’s also quite cheap compared to its competition per year if I’m not mistaken, and can also be family shared without costing much more.
Though I don’t think Boundless would exactly cost 80 bucks on switch, so we’d likely see it at 20 bucks like everywhere else, if it ever came to thst platform.
Honestly, even coming to Xbox would likely be massive, but Switch would likely be the most profitable option. Unsure which platform would have the most eager users tbh.
1 Like
It’s not going to happen. The game would have to be ported to the switch. Which means they would have to invest into Boundless.
5 Likes
Doing nothing is where the real losses would be. We still need to push for it regardless.
It was a “I heard” thread and anyone paying attention knows where something like this stands. No matter how hard one pushes. Now if it was stated as a suggestion then okay.
3 Likes
It’s not true.