come on? anyone forcing you to buy cubits? standing above you with gun point at your head? you buying cubits from your own will
Thatās not my point, I happily buy them. I never said anyone was forcing me to, im answering a question someone asked about whether people even buy cubits for plots any more. They do.
But when people are ācheatingā essentially to get the same effect then it seems a little unfair. Not just to people who pay to support the game but the game in itself.
3 Likes
im paying for GC and when i started i decided not to spent money on cubits, now i have 3 build in progress and kinda regret my decision 
but with every new exo exploring im getting more and more levels and cubits and i feel happy buying new plots coffer but reallyā¦ i wish i have 10000 plots for my disposal
Fairly shocked this went a whole business day with no dev attentionā¦not a peep from them.
Thatās probably because doing anything in EVE looks like youāre idling anyway! They couldnāt detect inactive from actively mining! 
1 Like
I went fishing for comments some months ago - this thread honestly started as more of a personal rant.
Direct comment from the devs would probably give a few people pause. IDK how much it would stop though since games with explicit policies and investments into anti-botting still have constant problems with this.
It is interesting to note the change in tone (and volume) of the comments/responses though.
Might just be the more dramatic title 
2 Likes
Or people just bored and on the forums more.
1 Like
Logging out people being idle isnāt the answer to thisā¦ I am surprised it keeps getting brought up.
In the end you can never stop people that want to cheat or lack the integrity to decide to choose to not cheat when something is hard or unfair or whatever. Instead we should just focus on removing things that give them the incentive. Make the game more fair, solves the higher objectives people are doing, and is fun enough that you donāt have to cheat.
I think removing regen bombs would cause even more issues then it would solve, personally.
5 Likes
i know i had sworn myself off of posting on the forums but just need to make a post here for my own sanity
the devs can and more then likely should ban the use of 3ed party porgrams that are used to make bots (IE autohotkey)
the devs cant and is impossible to ban the use of basic level macros to do this they would either have to
A. cut support for PC and just make boundless playstation only
or
B. ban every player that owns a logitech or razer keyboard or mouse has āmacroā functions are built into the fundamental software for those peripherals and even then you can save the functions in the keyboards onboard memory and run them without even needing the software running
sure if someone useās the basic macros to create a jankey afk bot then they can be manually banned but anti cheat cant detect it (for the reason i stated above) and depending on how the software works if the game thinks the user is hitting the keys and not the software then a afk timer would not work.
2 Likes
they tricking you guys into finding solution
Honestly, Iām a PS4 player and I donāt really mind if PC players use macros.
4 Likes
I am not promoting removing regen bombs. Iām promoting removing the loophole they offer that is being taken advantage and hurting the game, economy, and enable cheaters.
Could you be more specific about this loophole?
1 Like
Even if itās not to offer an immediate solution, a response from @james or @SamF about their official stance towards this type of behavior would go a long way. If thereās nothing then Iām going to assume that theyāre tolerant of it and Iāll be happy enough to spend my time and energy on other games.
Putting them in a tight spot man. Do you really need to see them say that it would be extremely expensive to develop or subscribe to anti-macro software or whatever technical ā ā ā ā they would need, and that it would be even more extremely difficult to find macro users and prove they werenāt just obsessively gathering for one reason or another? Because if they said that then it would also kind of look like they donāt careā¦ so why would they respond?
Banning active players should be the lowest priority on the devsā list, below deleting aoe and regen and requiring a passcode to continue playing. All terrible ideas.
If you are referring to macro use, I think you might be hard pressed to find a online game that punishes its users for macro use. Unless you are going to enter the realm of eSports.
1 Like
Thatās a pretty hard line but yeah, fair enough.
Theyāre actively supportive of software that violates the plain language of their and their distributorās ToS so thereās that. TBH itās a topic for another thread though. Thereās already people derailing he conversation regarding botting by constantly pointing the finger at the āmodsā they allow.
So far, for me, my pleasure from the game overall outweighs my worry about what other players are doing.
But as to how these things affect game balance, Weāre already at the point where things like a mass craft of ornate glass (50 panes) requires entire smart stacks of other base materials. When things reach the point where a casual player canāt possibly acquire or afford even midlevel materials without botting something the whole thing is likely to tank.
It seems there are plenty of people who donāt feel thatās an issue, though. Only time will tell.
1 Like
Just to re-clarify for you again the topic of the thread isnāt limited to the strict definition of a macro in the technical sense, but more focused on where the line is crossed into botting, which scripts are being distributed and referred to in common parlance as āmacrosā.
Hence the quotation marks.
hence why I said
Because if he is indeed referring to boting, then it is quite clear already how the devs feel about it by their behavior of adding what they called āBot Protectionā that nerfs exp when repetitive actions are taken. Why would they take steps to try and nerf the behavior if they supported it?
Actions speak louder then words in my book, and the action of them trying to deal with the boting situation should be good enough for anyone, that the devs do not like boting.
1 Like