All I ever see is a vocal few on both sides, some more so than others, in this threads case I chose not to respond to those people. I think there are a lot of us who don’t care one way or the other because we enjoy the game and if the team had to do a wipe, then it’s being done for a reason that they thought was critical for it to happen, so we would keep supporting the game and playing like we have been. Many of us just not using the forums and waiting for what ever changes occur to land in game because we just don’t care whats happening on the forums, where some seem to live a 3rd life, their second being the game.
If people think it would do enough good for the game to warrant being done then they clearly want a discussion on it and are looking for others to help make that argument with and/or for them. If you(ie: read everyone/anyone) are against such an action not responding to the thread is fantastic way of giving your input. An idea thread that gets no traction clearly wasn’t much of an idea to begin with. If it gets posts, watch and see the reasons given and how they are fleshed out in regards to how would a wipe fix those problems. If those ideas are enough to convince the dev team something was that wrong with the game to warrant a wipe, then it probably needed a wipe.
Dev has already said they arent wiping and not planning to. That should be good enough. If a well sourced reason comes up that backs why a wipe should occur and it convinced the Devs to do that, then I guess it was a pretty good reason. I guess that’s why it’s frustrating to see these threads spiral like this. If people who were against it just didn’t comment on it, then it wouldn’t get 80% of the traction it does. There might be 8-10 posts total and the post would die off or the devs would see an issue that maybe they should address and they’d bring it up with the community after having done what it is they do internally.