Although it would be cool, if you got a married character couple in Oort, which walks by you char, and everywhere they go, roses seem to pop out of nowhere.
@Bokke I did that in Skyrim, then she died.
Sounds tragic 
Sounds like a severe balancing problem 
I got lost in Skyrim - it is the game on Steam I played most by far (170!!! hours) - and Iām not even half through.
I didnāt even know I played it so much, and when I found out, I was kinda shocked.
That is a good point but I feel adding a mechanic for it generally helps to make it seem more right in the game.
Turns out it was my fault. I stepped on a button/trap floor and she was burned aliveā¦ It was indeedā¦ Uber tragicā¦
Well Iām not suggesting it was on purpose 
HOOLIGAN! I call shenanigans! OFFICER! This man is accusing me of murdering my wife after conveniently establishing her life insurance!
Would be a nice idea, to have marriage in Oort and some benefit-stats that go along with it.
Like tax sort of things. ALSO - just an idea, I wouldnāt wanna have OOrt as overly complex as EVE-Online, but itās sort of mind-sizzling to play with such ideas 
If this gets implemented, Iām gonna have a good laugh when griefers start proposing 
1 Like
WOAH!!! Awesomeeeee
The āPragmatic Marriage Overlord Projectā
Like set up a group of people, overrun a hostile village, marry all chars of the opposite ā ā ā there, and leave with them. Sort of a character-griefing system.
I am against any benefits gained from marriage because that would mean people would marry just to gain said benefit.
Griefers would be anoying anyway spamming the chat and such.
Odear - whatās the problem with it??
If the game has enough other in, in your eyes more sensible benefit stats, this would be just another welcome sort of adding boni to a char. Or two chars.
And you will always have pragmatic, professional players on MMOās, who undermine a casual way of playing. Be it whatever playstyle as there may be.
3 Likes
See, now I want Oort space travelā¦
Instead of calling it marriage just call it spirit binding or something ritual sounding, that way no one can complain about straight or not, and you can just bind to your best friend or sibling if you donāt have a significant other without feeling awkward about it.
2 Likes
Guys you can discuss it in a half year again thats an after 1.0 thing anyway xD
1 Like
Maybe soulmating or sth in this? Sounds not appropriate though. The term ābindingā is also not so apt for bonds between chars, creatures or people in general. I relate it more to objects.
But if we wait to 1.0 we are first going to agree on anything at 2.0
Sure! A manieristic option of a game should not be excluded. World of Warcraft took (attention - rough guess) ten(!) years to be a good game.